5
Sources
933
Studies
52143
Questions
490
Persons

Find researchers

You can also enter parts of the name to get a wider search result.
Creator: Deniz Okat (Hong Kong University), Mikael Paaso (Aalto University)
Title Description
Payment apps

This research is about the relationship between people’s trust in traditional financial institutions and their usage of Fintech products.

LISS panel > Payment apps

This research is about the relationship between people’s trust in traditional financial institutions and their usage of Fintech products.

Payment apps > Payment apps

This research is about the relationship between people’s trust in traditional financial institutions and their usage of Fintech products.

Creator: Didier Fouarge
Title Description
LISS panel > On lifelong learning 2017

Questionnaire on lifelong learning.

Creator: Didier Fouarge (ROA), Annemarie Künn (ROA)
Title Description
LISS panel > Developing for a lifetime

On educational development for a lifetime

Creator: Sanne van Wetten (ROA, Maastricht University), Didier Fouarge (ROA, Maastricht University)
Title Description
LISS panel > Entrepreneurship 2018

The survey is about entrepreneurship.

Creator: Toepoel, Vera, Dillman, Don
Title Description
Heuristics

In this study, the influence of verbal, numerical and visual language is tested on a five point scale. In August 2008, a questionnaire was administered to the LISS panel consisting of five questions measured on a five point scale. In September 2008, there was a follow-up survey with different visual heuristics. The aim of the surveys was to find out if the use of numbers and verbal labels reduces the effect of visual language.

Heuristics > Part 1

In August 2008, a questionnaire was administered to the LISS panel consisting of five questions measured on a five point scale. There were 18 different groups, in which three visual heuristics were tested: ‘middle means typical’, ‘left and top means first’, and ‘near means related’. For each heuristic, verbal labels (polar point vs fully labeled), numbers (added or not) and visual language such as color was varied. The aim of the survey was to find out if the use of numbers and verbal labels reduces the effect of visual language. In September 2008, there was a follow-up survey with different visual heuristics (Heuristics II).

Heuristics > Part 2

In September 2008, a questionnaire was administered to the LISS panel consisting of five questions measured on a five point scale. There were 16 different groups, in which two visual heuristics were tested: ‘up means good’, and ‘like means close’. For each heuristic, verbal labels (polar point vs fully labeled), numbers (added or not) and visual language such as color was varied. The aim of the survey was to find out if the use of numbers and verbal labels reduces the effect of visual language. In August 2008, a similar questionnaire was conducted in the LISS panel testing different visual heuristics (Heuristics I).

Creator: Van Wilsem, Johan, Donker, Andrea, Van Der Leun, Joanne
Title Description
LISS panel > Conventional and Computer Crime Victimization > Wave 3

In February 2012, the LISS panel completed a questionnaire on computer crime victimization. This is the third wave of the questionnaire.

Pages