5
Sources
933
Studies
52143
Questions
490
Persons
Title |
Description |
|---|---|
| True Risk Preferences > Testing Mechanisms for Identifying True Risk Preferences |
In February 2012, a questionnaire consisting of 5 parts was fielded in the LISS panel. Part 4 consisted of 5 different versions. The respondents were presented one of these versions, which version the respondent received, was determined at random. In the first 4 versions, the respondent had the possibility of earning money (with the exception of 1 conditional group, which was unable to earn money in part 4). Each time, the amount of money depended on the respondent’s decision and a die or coin tossed by the computer. One of the questionnaire parts was selected for actual payment of the sum earned. This amount was shown directly upon completion of the questionnaire. |
| True Risk Preferences > Testing Mechanisms for Identifying True Risk Preferences |
In February 2012, a questionnaire consisting of 5 parts was fielded in the LISS panel. Part 4 consisted of 5 different versions. The respondents were presented one of these versions, which version the respondent received, was determined at random. In the first 4 versions, the respondent had the possibility of earning money (with the exception of 1 conditional group, which was unable to earn money in part 4). Each time, the amount of money depended on the respondent’s decision and a die or coin tossed by the computer. One of the questionnaire parts was selected for actual payment of the sum earned. This amount was shown directly upon completion of the questionnaire. |
| True Risk Preferences > Testing Mechanisms for Identifying True Risk Preferences |
In February 2012, a questionnaire consisting of 5 parts was fielded in the LISS panel. Part 4 consisted of 5 different versions. The respondents were presented one of these versions, which version the respondent received, was determined at random. In the first 4 versions, the respondent had the possibility of earning money (with the exception of 1 conditional group, which was unable to earn money in part 4). Each time, the amount of money depended on the respondent’s decision and a die or coin tossed by the computer. One of the questionnaire parts was selected for actual payment of the sum earned. This amount was shown directly upon completion of the questionnaire. |
| True Risk Preferences |
Testing Mechanisms for Identifying True Risk Preferences. |
| True Risk Preferences |
Testing Mechanisms for Identifying True Risk Preferences. |
| True Risk Preferences |
Testing Mechanisms for Identifying True Risk Preferences. |
|
Title |
Description |
|---|---|
| Tonic immobility in response to trauma: Prevalence and consequences > Wave 1 - Part 2 |
In August 2011, a questionnaire on traumatic experiences was administered to the LISS panel. This study consisted of several scales measuring personality traits in relation to traumatisation. This is part two of two questionnaires on traumatic experiences. |
| Tonic immobility in response to trauma: Prevalence and consequences > Wave 1 - Part 2 |
In August 2011, a questionnaire on traumatic experiences was administered to the LISS panel. This study consisted of several scales measuring personality traits in relation to traumatisation. This is part two of two questionnaires on traumatic experiences. |
| Tonic immobility in response to trauma: Prevalence and consequences > Wave 1 - Part 1 |
In July 2011 a questionnaire on traumatic experiences was administered to the LISS panel.The survey investigates traumatic experiences people may have had in the past. This is part one of two questionnaires on traumatic experiences. |
| Tonic immobility in response to trauma: Prevalence and consequences > Wave 1 - Part 1 |
In July 2011 a questionnaire on traumatic experiences was administered to the LISS panel.The survey investigates traumatic experiences people may have had in the past. This is part one of two questionnaires on traumatic experiences. |
