5
Sources
933
Studies
52143
Questions
490
Persons

Find researchers

You can also enter parts of the name to get a wider search result.
Creator: Kroese, Floor M., Adriaanse, M.A., Evers, Catharine, De Ridder, D.T.D.
Titlesort descending Description
Bedtime Procrastination: An Exploration of the ‘Who’, ‘What’ and ‘Why’

In
the current study we aim to shed light on the prevalence of bedtime
procrastination in the general population and to find out to what extent it is
perceived as problematic. In addition, we aim to explore to what extent bedtime
procrastination can be considered a typical self-regulation problem, and what
are the most common reasons for people to stay up late. This project consists
of two parts, in the second part people keep a diary in which bedtime behavior
is assessed.

Bedtime Procrastination: An Exploration of the ‘Who’, ‘What’ and ‘Why’

In
the current study we aim to shed light on the prevalence of bedtime
procrastination in the general population and to find out to what extent it is
perceived as problematic. In addition, we aim to explore to what extent bedtime
procrastination can be considered a typical self-regulation problem, and what
are the most common reasons for people to stay up late. This project consists
of two parts, in the second part people keep a diary in which bedtime behavior
is assessed.

Bedtime Procrastination: An Exploration of the ‘Who’, ‘What’ and ‘Why’ > Part 1

In part 1 the LISS panel completed a questionnaire about bedtime
procrastination.

Bedtime Procrastination: An Exploration of the ‘Who’, ‘What’ and ‘Why’ > Part 1

In part 1 the LISS panel completed a questionnaire about bedtime
procrastination.

Bedtime Procrastination: An Exploration of the ‘Who’, ‘What’ and ‘Why’ > Part 2

In part 2 people keep a diary in which
bedtime behaviour is assessed.

Bedtime Procrastination: An Exploration of the ‘Who’, ‘What’ and ‘Why’ > Part 2

In part 2 people keep a diary in which
bedtime behaviour is assessed.

Creator: Evers, Ellen R.K., Lindenberg, S.M.
Titlesort descending Description
Collecting as Self-Regulation

The aim of the study is to investigate how many people of the LISS-panel collect, why they themselves think they do so and whether
this behavior is correlated with personality characteristics and social
consequences in order to quantify the basics of collecting behavior.

The
project consists of two questionnaires, administered in August 2013, and September 2013.

Collecting as Self-Regulation > Part 1

This questionnaire examines the prevalence
of collecting behavior and its functions and motives.

Collecting as Self-Regulation > Part 2

This questionnaire examines the prevalence
of collecting behavior and its functions and motives.

Creator: C.W.A.M. Aarts (University of Twente Twente), H. Anker (University of Nijmegen), J.J.M. van Holsteyn (University of Leiden), E.V. Oppenhuis (University of Amsterdam), P.C.P.M Pennings (Free University Amsterdam), K. Wittebrood (University of Nijmegen), Stichting Kiezersonderzoek Nederland (SKON)
Titlesort descending Description
Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies > Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1994

Two wave survey on voters' opinions: before and after the Dutch parliamentary elections of May 3, 1994. Pre-election wave: reading of newspapers, tv-newscast exposure / most important national problems / party identification and membership / evaluation of government policy on economy, employment and respondents personal finances / perception of main parties' standpoints on various political issues: euthanasia, crime, income differences, nuclear plants, ethnic minorities, R's own viewpoints regarding these matters / voting at last municipal elections /feasibility of multi-party system / sympathy rating of parties and leading politicians / coalition preference / party identification of parents / most essential goals in life / the inflow of asylum-seekers / the meaning of life / the life of Brian / Post-election wave: exposure to election campaigns, participation in it / voting behaviour, time of vote decision, voting stability / image of political parties regarding their ability to solve specific problems: crime, employment, pollution, welfare-fraud, financing deficit, pensioners' incomes / importance ranking of these problems / voting for European parliament / perception of main parties' standpoints on the unification of Europe, R's own standpoints in this matter / who will be the best prime minister / familiarity with politicians / best &amp, worst qualities of leading politicians / left-right rating of political parties / meaning of the concepts of left and right / sense of political efficacy / image of politicians and the political system / civic competence / relation between citizens and politicians / importance of the city council ( gemeenteraad ), provincial states ( provinciale staten ), national and European parliament to R's personal life / importance ranking of various political and personal issues / political participation / who are most entitled to a job / attitude to foreigners / racism / positive discrimination / chance that R will ever vote for other political parties / role of religion in public life, pillarization. Background variables: basic characteristics/ residence/ household characteristics/ occupation/employment/ income/capital assets/ education/ social class/ politics/ religion/ readership, mass media, and 'cultural' exposure/ organizational membership.

Pages