Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies > Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 2010
Publisher
SKON
Creator
Dr. H. Kolk (Universiteit Twente); Prof.dr. C.W.A.M. Aarts (Universiteit Twente); Prof.dr. J.N. Tillie (Universiteit van Amsterdam)
Created
Nov 04 2014
Description
Two wave survey on voters' opinions: before and after the Dutch parliamentary elections of 2010. background characteristics/ political interest and communication/ most important national problem/ resignation Balkenende (IV)/ party adherence and membership/ voting as a civic duty/ government policy/ vote intention second chamber 2010/ perception of poll results/ political issues: euthanasia/ political issues: income differences/ political issues: asylum seekers/ political issues: crime/ political issues: foreigners/ social issues/ previous voting behaviour/ political knowledge/ government coalition preference/ coalition probability/ sympathy scores political parties/ sympathy scores party leaders/ representation: respondent opinion/ respondents opinion on crime/ social protest and government response/ background characteristics/ party preference father/ party preference mother/ interest political campaign/ voting behaviour second chamber 2010/ trust in voting institutions/ perception of poll results/ vote matchers/ most important campaign issue/ party able to solve problem/ opinion representation/ future voting behaviour/ political issues: nuclear plants/ political issues: European unification/ political issues: international military missions/ left-right rating political parties/ satisfaction with democracy/ faith in politicians as prime minister/ external political efficacy/ respondents perception of politicians/ social exclusion respondent/ membership of respondent and household members/ activities and communication to influence government/ trust in institutions/ confidence in economic situation/ confessional attitude/ EU membership/ democratic reform/ self-completed questionnaire Several variables have been excluded from the public data file in order to protect the privacy of individual respondents. Examples are municipality, zip code and the regional newspaper a person is reading. These variables are available for scientific purposes only at Statistics Netherlands. For more information, contact the Centre for Policy Related Statistics at Statistics Netherlands via cvb@cbs.nl.
URL to resource
Panel
nko
Begin date
Apr 28 2010
| Name | English | Dutch |
|---|---|---|
| 2010W1Q001 | (Enq: Determine the sex of the respondent) | (Enq: Stel het geslacht van de respondent vast) |
| 2010W1Q002 | What is your date of birth? | Wat is uw geboortedatum? |
| 2010W1Q003 | So the age of the respondent is [....]? | (Persoon1) is dus: [leeftijd in jaren] ? |
| 2010W1Q004 | What is the marital status of the respondent? | Wat is op dit moment de burgerlijke staat van (persoon1)? |
| 2010W1Q005 | How often do you read a newspaper. Is that almost daily; a few times a week; a few times a month; or do you seldom or never read a paper? | Hoe vaak leest u een krant. Is dat vrijwel dagelijks; een paar keer per week; een paar keer per maand; of leest u zelden of nooit een krant? |
| 2010W1Q006 | When there is domestic news in the newspapers, for example news about government problems, do you read this (nearly) always; often; now and… | Als er in de krant binnenlands nieuws staat, bijvoorbeeld nieuws over regeringsproblemen, leest u dat dan:bijna altijd; vaak; zo nu en dan;… |
| 2010W1Q007 | When there is a discussion in a group about domestic news in our country, do you generally join the conversation, do you listen with intere… | Als er in gezelschap over binnenlands nieuws gesproken wordt, doet u dan meestal mee met het gesprek, luistert u met belangstelling, luiste… |
| 2010W1Q008 | When there is foreign news in the newspaper, for example about tensions or discussions between different countries, how often do you read s… | Als er in de krant buitenlands nieuws staat, bijvoorbeeld nieuws over spanningen of besprekingen tussen verschillende landen, hoe vaak lees… |
| 2010W1Q009 | Are you very interested in political topics, fairly interested or not interested? | Bent u zeer geïnteresseerd in politieke onderwerpen, tamelijk geïnteresseerd of niet geïnteresseerd? |
| 2010W1Q010 | Which newspapers do you read (almost) daily? | Welke krant of welke kranten leest u dagelijks of vrijwel dagelijks ? |
| 2010W1Q011 | Which paper(s)? | Stel vast: Welke krant(en) |
| 2010W1Q012 | How often do you generally watch the NOS television newscast? | Hoe vaak in de week volgt u het NOS journaal? |
| 2010W1Q013 | How often do you generally watch the RTL4 television newscast? | Hoe vaak in de week volgt u het RTL4-journaal? |
| 2010W1Q014 | How often do you visit internet sites containing information about political and social issues? | Hoe vaak bezoekt u op het internet pagina's met informatie over politieke en maatschappelijke onderwerpen? |
| 2010W1Q015 | And now, I would like to ask you what you think are the most important problems in our country? | Vervolgens zou ik u willen vragen wat u de belangrijkste problemen in ons land vindt? |
| 2010W1Q016a | At the end of February, the Balkenende Cabinet fell and it submitted its resignation to the Queen. According to you, what was the reason th… | Eind februari is het kabinet Balkenende gevallen en heeft het zijn ontslag aangeboden aan de Koningin. Waarover is het kabinet volgens u ge… |
| 2010W1Q016b | Do you feel it was correct for the Cabinet to resign over this question or was it not correct? | Vindt u het juist dat het kabinet hierover gevallen is of vindt u dat niet juist? |
| 2010W1Q016c | Which party or which person is in your opinion most to blame for the resignation of the Balkenende Cabinet? | Welke partij of welke persoon was volgens u vooral schuldig aan de val van het kabinet? |
| 2010W1Q017 | Do you think of yourself as an adherent to a political party? | Voelt u zich aanhanger van een politieke partij? |
| 2010W1Q018 | Is there a party to which you feel more attracted than to other parties? | Is er een partij waartoe u zich meer voelt aangetrokken dan tot andere partijen? |
| 2010W1Q019a | To which party or parties? | Van welke partij of partijen ben u een aanhanger? |
| 2010W1Q019b | Would you call yourself a convinced adherent to this party, or do you not consider yourself to be a convinced adherent? | Zou u zichzelf een overtuigde aanhanger willen noemen of vindt u zichzelf niet zo'n overtuigde aanhanger? |
| 2010W1Q020 | Which party is that? | Welke partij is dat? |
| 2010W1Q021 | Are you a member of a party, or not? | Bent u lid van een politieke partij? |
| 2010W1Q022 | Of which party? | Van welke partij? |
| 2010W1Q023 | To some people voting in elections is a civic duty. These people feel they are supposed to vote, regardless of candidates and parties. To o… | Voor sommige mensen is het stemmen bij verkiezingen een burgerplicht. Deze mensen vinden dat ze behoren te stemmen, ongeacht de kandidaten … |
| 2010W1Q024 | To what extent is voting in elections a civic duty to you? | In welke mate is stemmen bij verkiezingen voor u een burgerplicht. Is dat |
| 2010W1Q025 | I would now like to ask a few questions about what you think of the policies that the government has conducted during the past four years. | Ik wil nu een paar vragen stellen over wat u vindt van het beleid dat de afgelopen 4 jaar door de regering gevoerd is. |
| 2010W1Q026 | How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with what the government has done during the past three years? | Hoe tevreden of ontevreden bent u in het algemeen met wat de regering in de afgelopen drie jaar heeft gedaan |
| 2010W1Q027 | On June 9 elections for the second chamber will be held. Do you intend to vote, or do you not know yet? | Op 9 juni zijn er verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer. Gaat u dan stemmen of weet u dat nog niet? |
| 2010W1Q028 | Which party do you intend to vote for on June 9? | Op welke partij gaat u stemmen op 9 juni? |
| 2010W1Q029 | Are there perhaps any other parties you consider to vote for at the elections on June 9? | Zijn er misschien nog andere partijen waarop u overweegt te gaan stemmen bij de verkiezingen op 9 juni? |
| 2010W1Q030 | Are there parties you consider to vote for? | Zijn er misschien partijen waarop u op dit moment overweegt te gaan stemmen bij de verkiezingen op 9 juni? |
| 2010W1Q031 | Which party/parties are that? | Welke partijen zijn dat? |
| 2010W1Q032 | If you were obligated to vote, for which party would you vote then? | Als het verplicht zou zijn om te gaan stemmen, op welke partij zou u dan stemmen? |
| 2010W1Q033 | Are there perhaps any parties you consider to vote for at the elections on June 9? | Zijn er misschien partijen waarop u overweegt te gaan stemmen bij de verkiezingen op 9 juni? |
| 2010W1Q034 | Which parties do you consider to vote for? | Welke partijen zijn dat? |
| 2010W1Q035 | How many times in the past weeks have you encountered poll results in newspapers, radio or television? Was that: seldom or never; from time… | Hoe vaak bent u in de laatste weken uitslagen van opiniepeilingen tegengekomen in de krant, op radio of televisie. Is dat: zelden of nooit;… |
| 2010W1Q036 | In your opinion, is the image these polls provide of the support for the various parties: very poor; poor; moderate; good; very good | Is naar uw mening het beeld dat opiniepeilingen geven van de aanhang van de partijen: zeer slecht; slecht; matig; goed; of zeer goed? |
| 2010W1Q037 | How many seats do you expect the following parties to obtain at the upcoming elections? | Hoeveel zetels denkt u dat de volgende partijen bij de aanstaande verkiezingen zullen krijgen? |
| 2010W1Q038 | Some people think that euthanasia should always be forbidden. Other people think that euthanasia should be possible if the patient asks for… | Sommige mensen vinden dat euthanasie altijd verboden moet zijn. Anderen vinden dat euthanasie mogelijk moet zijn als de patiënt daarom vraa… |
| 2010W1Q039 | Some people think that the differences in incomes in our country should be increased. Others think that they should be decreased. Of course… | Sommige mensen vinden dat de verschillen in inkomens in ons land groter moeten worden. Anderen dat ze kleiner moeten worden. Natuurlijk zij… |
| 2010W1Q040 | Some people think that the Netherlands should allow more asylum seekers to enter. Others that the Netherlands should send asylum seekers wh… | Sommige mensen vinden dat Nederland meer asielzoekers moet toelaten. Anderen dat Nederland de asielzoekers die hier al zijn zoveel mogelijk… |
| 2010W1Q041 | People think differently about the way the government fights crime. Where would you place the following parties on a line from 1 to 7, wher… | Over de manier waarop de overheid optreedt tegen criminaliteit wordt verschillend gedacht. Waar zou u de volgende partijen plaatsen op een … |
| 2010W1Q042 | In the Netherlands some think that foreigners should be able to live in the Netherlands while preserving their own culture. Others think th… | In Nederland vinden sommigen dat allochtonen hier moeten kunnen leven met behoud van de eigen cultuur. Anderen vinden dat zij zich geheel m… |
| 2010W1Q043 | I will now read you some statements. Could you indicate on the basis of the show card to what extent you agree or disagree with each of the… | Ik lees u nu enkele uitspraken voor. Wilt u aan de hand van de toonkaart telkens zeggen in welke mate u het eens of oneens bent met de uits… |
| 2010W1Q044 | Did you vote in the most recent municipal elections? | Heeft u gestemd bij de laatste gemeenteraadsverkiezingen? |
| 2010W1Q045 | For which party did you vote then? | Op welke partij heeft u toen gestemd? |
| 2010W1Q046 | The previous elections for the Second Chamber were held in 2006. Did you vote in these elections; or not; or were you not entitled to vote? | De vorige verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer zijn in 2006 gehouden. Hebt u toen gestemd of niet? |
| 2010W1Q047 | For which party did you vote then? | Op welke partij hebt u toen gestemd? |
| 2010W1Q048 | Have you always voted for this party at the elections for the Second Chamber? | Hebt u bij de Tweede Kamer verkiezingen altijd op deze partij gestemd? |
| 2010W1Q049 | When you vote for a party you can choose from a list of candidates. Did you vote in 2006 for the number 1 on the list or for another candid… | Bij het stemmen op een partij kan worden gekozen uit een lijst van kandidaten. Hebt u in 2006 op de nummer 1 van de lijst gestemd of op een… |
| 2010W1Q050 | Have you, before the elections of 2006, when you were entitled to vote in parliamentary elections, always voted? | Hebt u vóór de verkiezingen van 2006, als u mocht stemmen bij Tweede Kamerverkiezingen, altijd gestemd? |
| 2010W1Q051 | I will now show you photographs of politicians. Could you tell me for each person the name; the party; and the function? | Ik laat u nu foto’s zien van een aantal politici. Wilt u van elke persoon de naam, de partij en de functie zeggen. |
| 2010W1Q052 | Do you know which parties were in the governing coalition until February? | Weet u welke politieke partijen er tot februari in de regeringscoalitie zaten? |
| 2010W1Q053 | Which political parties were that? | Welke politieke partijen waren dat? |
| 2010W1Q054 | After the elections for the Second Chamber a new government coalition must be formed. According to you which parties should be part of the … | Na de verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer moet er een nieuwe regering worden gevormd. Welke partijen moeten volgens u deel uitmaken van de ni… |
| 2010W1Q055 | Are there perhaps other parties which according to you should be part of the government as well? | Zijn er wellicht nog andere partijen die volgens u ook moeten deelnemen aan deze regering? |
| 2010W1Q056 | Which parties are that? | Welke partijen zijn dat? |
| 2010W1Q057 | Does it make much difference to you, a little, or no difference at all which parties become part of the government? | Maakt het voor u veel, weinig of niets uit welke partijen in de regering komen? |
| 2010W1Q058 | And now I would like to ask you something about parties that might form a future government together. | Dan zou ik u nu wat willen vragen over partijen die mogelijk samen een toekomstige regering gaan vormen. |
| 2010W1Q059 | And now I would like to know from you how sympathetic you find the political parties. You can give each party a score between 0 and 10. Wit… | Dan zou ik nu graag van u willen weten hoe sympathiek u politieke partijen vindt. U kunt iedere partij hiervoor een cijfer geven van 0 tot … |
| 2010W1Q060 | I would like to know from you how sympathetic you find party leaders. To this you can give party leaders points between 0 and 10. 0 means t… | Ik zou graag van u weten hoe sympathiek u partijleiders vindt. U kunt partijleiders hiervoor punten geven tussen de 0 en de 10. 0 wil zegge… |
| 2010W1Q061 | I would now like to ask you some questions about what you think politicians should do. | Ik wil u nu wat vragen stellen over wat politici volgens u moeten doen. |
| 2010W1Q062 | Now I would like to present you some statements about punishment in the Netherlands. | Nu zou ik u enkele uitspraken willen voorleggen over straffen in Nederland. |
| 2010W1Q063 | In general are crimes punished too harshly, too leniently, or just right in the Netherlands? | Worden misdaden in Nederland over het algemeen te zwaar, te licht of juist goed bestraft? |
| 2010W1Q064 | Imagine: the government decides to increase the number of pupil in school classes. As a protest a number of parents and teachers occupy a s… | Stelt u zich voor: de regering besluit het aantal leerlingen per klas te verhogen. Uit protest hiertegen houden een aantal ouders en onderw… |
| 2010W1Q065 | Imagine: the teachers who participated in the occupation are fired. Do you approve; or disapprove? | Stelt u zich voor: de onderwijzers die aan de bezetting hebben meegedaan, worden ontslagen. Zou u dat goedkeuren; of afkeuren? |
| 2010W1Q066 | Can you answer questions about the family where you lived between the age of 10 and 16? | Dan wil ik u nu enkele vragen stellen over de periode waarin u 10 tot 16 jaar was. Kunt u vragen beantwoorden over het gezin waar u tussen … |
| 2010W1Q067 | Who was the most important male parent or caretaker in that family? | Wie was de voornaamste mannelijke ouder of verzorger in dat gezin? |
| 2010W1Q068 | Who was the most important female parent or caretaker in that family? | Wie was de voornaamste vrouwelijke ouder of verzorger in dat gezin? |
| 2010W1Q069 | At that time, were political topics discussed often, fairly often, not often, or not at all in your home? | Werd er toen bij u thuis veel, tamelijk veel, weinig of niet over politieke onderwerpen gesproken? |
| 2010W1Q070 | Do you know which party (1 your father / 2 your stepfather / 3 your foster father / 4 the male caretaker in the family) preferred then ? | Weet u nog aan welke partij uw VADER TOEN de voorkeur gaf? |
| 2010W1Q071 | And which party was that? | En welke partij was dat? |
| 2010W1Q072 | And do you know which party (1 your mother / 2 your stepmother / 3 your foster mother / 4 the female caretaker in the family) preferred th… | Weet u nog aan welke partij (1 uw moeder / 2 uw stiefmoeder / 3 uw pleegmoeder / 4 de vrouwelijke verzorger in het gezin) toen de voorkeur … |
| 2010W1Q073 | And which party was that? | En welke partij was dat? |
| 2010W1Q074 | And now I would like to know some background characteristics of you. Do you consider yourself to be religious? | Dan zou ik nu nog graag enkele achtergrondkenmerken van u willen weten. Beschouwt u zichzelf als gelovig? |
| 2010W1Q075 | Do you consider yourself a member of a particular church or religious community and if yes, of which one? | Rekent u zichzelf tot een bepaalde kerkelijke gezindte of levensbeschouwelijke groepering en zo ja: tot welke? |
| 2010W1Q076 | How often do you generally attend church, the mosque or religious services? | Hoe vaak gaat u in het algemeen naar de kerk, moskee of naar een godsdienstige bijeenkomst? |
| 2010W1Q077 | One sometimes speaks of the existence of various social classes and groups. If you were to assign yourself to a particular social class, wo… | Er wordt wel eens gesproken over het bestaan van verschillende sociale klassen en groepen. Als u zichzelf tot een bepaalde sociale klasse z… |
| 2010W1Q078 | Are you a member of a labor union? | Bent U lid van een vakbond? |
| 2010W1Q082 | The next questions are about your profession. | De volgende vragen gaan over uw beroep. |
| 2010W1Q083 | The next question is about your own education. | Dan zou ik nu een aantal vragen over uw opleiding willen stellen |
| 2010W1Q084 | Establish: does respondent has a partner that is a member of the household? | Heeft OP een partner die lid is van het huishouden? |
| 2010W1Q085 | Establish: Year of birth partner? | Geboortejaar partner OP? |
| 2010W1Q086 | Establish: gender of partner? | Geslacht partner OP? |
| 2010W1Q087 | Could you indicate by means of this card the highest education for which your partner received a diploma? | Kunt u aan de hand van dit toonblad zeggen wat de hoogste school- opleiding is waarvan uw partner een diploma heeft behaald |
| 2010W2Q001 | I want to start with a question about the campaign that preceded the Second Chamber elections. Where there according to you during the camp… | Ik wil beginnen met een vraag over de campagne die aan de Kamerverkiezingen is voorafgegaan. Waren er naar uw mening tijdens de campagne: g… |
| 2010W2Q002 | Have you followed the election campaign very extensively; extensively; not very extensively; or haven’t you followed it at all? | Hebt u de verkiezingscampagne zeer intensief, intensief, niet zo intensief of in het geheel niet gevolgd? |
| 2010W2Q003 | How often do you read a newspaper. Is that almost daily; a few times a week; a few times a month; or do you seldom or never read a paper? | Hoe vaak leest u een krant. Is dat vrijwel dagelijks; een paar keer per week; een paar keer per maand; of leest u zelden of nooit een krant? |
| 2010W2Q004 | If there was news about the election campaign in the newspaper, did you read this: | Als er in de krant nieuws over de verkiezingscampagne stond, las u dat dan: |
| 2010W2Q005 | In the week prior to the election, debates were held on television between the leaders of the big political parties. Have you: seen one or … | In de week voorafgaand aan de verkiezingen werden op de televisie debatten gevoerd tussen de lijsttrekkers van de grote politieke partijen.… |
| 2010W2Q006 | Did you vote in the parliamentary elections on June 9? | Hebt u bij de Kamerverkiezingen van 9 juni gestemd? |
| 2010W2Q007 | Did you authorize someone to vote for you by proxy? | Heeft u aan iemand een volmacht gegeven om voor u te gaan stemmen? |
| 2010W2Q008 | For which party did you vote then? | Op welke partij hebt u gestemd? |
| 2010W2Q009 | Why did you vote [Question 2010W2Q008]? | Waarom hebt u op deze partij gestemd? |
| 2010W2Q010 | When did you decide to vote for this party, was this: on election day; the last days before the elections; the last weeks before the electi… | Wanneer hebt u besloten om op deze partij te stemmen, was dat: op de dag van de verkiezingen zelf; de laatste dagen voor de verkiezingen; d… |
| 2010W2Q011 | At what time did you vote? | Hoe laat heeft u gestemd? |
| 2010W2Q012 | Did you vote for the first candidate on the party list or for another candidate? | Hebt u gestemd op de lijsttrekker of op een andere kandidaat? |
| 2010W2Q013 | What was the most important reason for you to vote for this candidate? | Wat was de belangrijkste reden om op deze kandidaat te stemmen? |
| 2010W2Q014 | You voted for the first candidate on the list of [party voted for]. Had this to do with supporting the first candidate on the list or suppo… | U hebt gestemd op de lijsttrekker van (het/de) [WelkPart]. Ging het daarbij vooral om steun te geven aan de lijsttrekker of om steun te gev… |
| 2010W2Q015 | If this person would not have been the first candidate on the list, but would have been on a lower place on the list, would you still voted… | Als deze persoon geen lijsttrekker zou zijn geweest, maar op een lagere plaats zou hebben gestaan, zou u dan ook op deze persoon hebben ges… |
| 2010W2Q016 | If the first candidate on the list of [party voted for] would not have been on the list of [party voted for], but on the list of another pa… | Als de lijsttrekker van (het/de) [WelkPart] niet op de lijst van (het/de) [WelkPart] zou hebben 144 gestaan, maar op de lijst van een ánde… |
| 2010W2Q017 | If the candidate of [party voted for] you voted for would not have been on the list of [party voted for], but on the list of another party,… | Als de kandidaat van (het/de) [WelkPart] waarop u hebt gestemd niet op de lijst van (het/de) [WelkPart] zou hebben gestaan, maar op de lijs… |
| 2010W2Q018 | To whom did you give your proxy? | Aan wie heeft u die volmacht gegeven? |
| 2010W2Q019 | Were you authorized by anyone to vote by proxy? | Heeft u een volmacht van iemand anders gekregen? |
| 2010W2Q020 | From whom? | Van wie? |
| 2010W2Q021 | Did you seriously consider not to vote? | Hebt u serieus overwogen om niet te gaan stemmen? |
| 2010W2Q022 | Did you seriously consider to vote for another party, instead of [party voted for]? | Hebt u serieus overwogen om op een andere partij te stemmen, dan op (het/de) [WelkPart]? |
| 2010W2Q023 | Which one? | Op welke? |
| 2010W2Q024a | Was there a party, or were there parties you would never vote for? | Was er een partij, of waren er partijen waar u nooit op zou stemmen? |
| 2010W2Q024b | Which one? | Welke? |
| 2010W2Q025 | Why did you not vote? | Waarom heeft U niet gestemd? |
| 2010W2Q026 | When did you decide not to vote, was that: on election day; the last days before the elections; the last weeks before the elections; a few … | Wanneer hebt u besloten om niet te gaan stemmen, was dat: op de dag van de verkiezingen zelf; de laatste dagen voor de verkiezingen; de laa… |
| 2010W2Q027 | Suppose that you had in fact voted, which party would you have voted for? | Stel dat u toch had gestemd, op welke partij had u dan gestemd? |
| 2010W2Q028 | And how much trust do you have in general in the elections? Is that: very much; much; not much but also not little; little; or very little … | Hoeveel vertrouwen hebt u in het algemeen in een eerlijk verloop van de verkiezingen? Is dat: zeer veel; veel; niet veel maar ook niet wein… |
| 2010W2Q029 | There are different ways to vote: with a voting machine or with a ballot paper. How much trust do you have in voting with a voting machine,… | Er zijn verschillende manieren waarop kan worden gestemd: per stemcomputer of met een papieren stembiljet. Hoeveel vertrouwen hebt u in ste… |
| 2010W2Q030 | And in voting with a ballot paper? Is that: very much trust; much trust; not much but also not little; little trust; or very little trust. | En in stemmen met een papieren stembiljet? Is dat: Zeer veel vertrouwen; Veel vertrouwen; Niet veel maar ook niet weinig vertrouwen; Weinig… |
| 2010W2Q031 | If you were able to choose, what would you prefer. Is this: voting with the voting machine; voting with a ballot paper; or do you not have … | Als u zou kunnen kiezen, wat zou dan uw voorkeur zijn. Is dat: stemmen met de stemcomputer; stemmen met een papieren stembiljet; of hebt u … |
| 2010W2Q032 | Do you find voting with the voting machine compared to voting with a ballot paper: more trustworthy; less trustworthy; or is there no diffe… | Vindt u stemmen met de stemcomputer ten opzichte van stemmen met een papieren stembiljet: |
| 2010W2Q033 | People are allowed to let someone else for them. The so-called proxy vote. What do you think, should everyone cast their own vote from now … | Mensen mogen iemand anders voor hen laten stemmen. Het zogenoemde stemmen per volmacht. Wat denkt u, moet iedereen voortaan zelf zijn stem … |
| 2010W2Q034 | When voting, people have to identify themselves with a valid passport or drivers license. Do you agree or disagree with this? | Bij het stemmen moeten mensen zich legitimeren met een geldig paspoort of rijbewijs. Bent u het daarmee eens of oneens? |
| 2010W2Q035 | Prior to the elections many opinion polls are held to discover how people are planning to vote. How often during the last weeks have you no… | Voorafgaand aan verkiezingen worden nogal eens opiniepeilingen gehouden om er achter te komen wat mensen van plan zijn te gaan stemmen. Ho… |
| 2010W2Q036 | Did these polls influence your voting behavior very strongly; a little; or not at all? | Hebben deze peilingen uw stemgedrag sterk beïnvloed, een beetje beïnvloed of helemaal niet beïnvloed? |
| 2010W2Q037 | Did these polls influence your decision to vote or not to vote very strongly; a little; or not at all? | Hebben deze peilingen uw beslissing om wel of niet te gaan stemmen sterk beïnvloed, een beetje beïnvloed of helemaal niet beïnvloed? |
| 2010W2Q038 | Do you know one or more tests of political preference on the internet, where people can find out which party they agree with most? | Kent u één of meer stemwijzers op internet, waar mensen kunnen uitzoeken met welke partij ze het het meeste eens zijn? |
| 2010W2Q039 | Did you fill in one or more tests of political preference previous to the elections? | Hebt u voorafgaande aan de verkiezingen één of meer stemwijzers serieus ingevuld? |
| 2010W2Q040 | What advice did the test of political preference give you? | Welk advies of welke adviezen gaf de stemwijzer of gaven de stemwijzers? |
| 2010W2Q041 | Did the use of a vote matcher influence your decision wether or not to vote very strongly, a little or not at all? | Heeft het gebruik van een stemwijzer uw beslissing om wel of niet te gaan stemmen sterk beïnvloed, een beetje beïnvloed of helemaal niet be… |
| 2010W2Q042 | And did the use of a vote matcher influence your choice for a specific party very strongly, a little, or not at all? | En heeft het gebruik van een stemwijzer uw keuze voor een bepaalde partij sterk beïnvloed, een beetje beïnvloed of helemaal niet beïnvloed? |
| 2010W2Q043 | What was according to you the most important topic during the elections? | Wat was voor u persoonlijk het belangrijkste onderwerp van deze verkiezingen? |
| 2010W2Q044 | And what was the second most important topic during the elections? | Wat was voor u persoonlijk het op één na belangrijkste onderwerp van deze verkiezingen? |
| 2010W2Q045 | What is according to you the most important political problem in the Netherlands? | Wat is volgens u op dit moment het belangrijkste politieke probleem voor Nederland? |
| 2010W2Q046 | And what is the second most important political problem for the Netherlands right now? | Wat is volgens u op dit moment het op één na belangrijkste politieke probleem voor Nederland? |
| 2010W2Q047 | What party is according to you best capable to of solving the problem of [most important national problem]? | Welke partij is volgens u het beste in staat het probleem van [ProblNed1] op te lossen? |
| 2010W2Q048 | What party is according to you best capable to of solving the problem of [second most important national problem]? | Welke partij is volgens u het beste in staat het probleem van [ProblNed2] op te lossen? |
| 2010W2Q049 | Some people say it does not matter at all who is in power. Others say that it makes a big difference who is in power. If 1 means that it do… | Sommige mensen zeggen dat het helemaal niets uitmaakt wie er aan de macht is. Anderen zeggen dat het een groot verschil maakt. Als 1 beteke… |
| 2010W2Q050 | Some people say that whatever one votes, does not make any difference to what happens. Others say that what one votes for, can make a big d… | Sommige mensen zeggen dat waar je op stemt niets uitmaakt voor wat er gebeurt. Anderen zeggen dat het heel veel kan uitmaken voor wat er ge… |
| 2010W2Q051 | When we look at the achievements of the government in The Hague in the pas three years. Has the government according to you done a very goo… | Als we kijken naar de prestaties van de regering in Den Haag in de afgelopen drie jaar. Heeft de regering volgens u haar werk zeer goed ged… |
| 2010W2Q052 | Is there a political party that corresponds with you views? | Is er een politieke partij die uw opvattingen redelijk goed weergeeft? |
| 2010W2Q053 | Which party? | Aan welke partij denkt u dan? |
| 2010W2Q054 | Besides the fact what you think of their political party, is there a party leader that represents your views reasonably well? | Los van wat u vindt van hun politieke partij, is er een partijleider die uw opvattingen redelijk goed weergeeft? |
| 2010W2Q055 | Which party leader are you thinking of in this respect? | Aan welke partijleider(s) denkt u dan? |
| 2010W2Q056 | I will now name you some parties. Would you repeatedly indicate on a scale from 1 to 10 how probable it is that you will ever vote for that… | Ik noem u nu een aantal partijen. Wilt u telkens op een lijn van 1 tot en met 10 aangeven hoe waarschijnlijk het is dat u er ooit op zult s… |
| 2010W2Q057 | Some people think that nuclear power plants are the solution to a shortage of energy in the future. Others think nuclear power plants shoul… | Sommige mensen vinden dat kerncentrales de oplossing zijn voor een tekort aan energie in de toekomst. Anderen vinden dat er geen kerncentra… |
| 2010W2Q058 | Some people and parties think that the European unification should go further. Others think that the European unification has already gone … | Sommige mensen en partijen vinden dat de Europese eenwording nog verder zou moeten gaan. Anderen vinden dat de Europese eenwording al te ve… |
| 2010W2Q059 | Some people think the Netherlands should never provide soldiers to international missions. Others think that the Netherlands should always … | Sommige mensen vinden dat Nederland nooit militairen moet leveren aan internationale missies. Anderen vinden dat Nederland dat altijd moet … |
| 2010W2Q060 | In politics people sometimes talk about left and right. Would you please indicate the degree to which you think that a party is left or rig… | In de politiek wordt soms gesproken over links en rechts. Wilt u aan de hand van deze kaart aangeven in welke mate u vindt dat een partij l… |
| 2010W2Q061 | When you think of your own political opinions, where would you place yourself on this line? Please mention the number that applies to you. | Wanneer u denkt aan uw eigen politieke opvattingen, waar zou u zichzelf dan plaatsen? Noemt u maar het cijfer dat op u van toepassing is. |
| 2010W2Q062 | Now I would like to ask you some questions about the way democracy works. | Nu wil ik u enkele vragen stellen over het functioneren van de democratie. |
| 2010W2Q063 | What do you actually think of elections in the Netherlands? Do you think that elections insure that the opinions of the voters are transmit… | Hoe denkt u eigenlijk over verkiezingen in Nederland? Denkt u dat verkiezingen ervoor zorgen dat de opvattingen van de kiezers goed worden … |
| 2010W2Q064 | I will mention to you the names of possible candidates for the position of Prime Minister. Could you indicate with a number between 1 and 7… | Ik noem u telkens de naam van een mogelijke kandidaat voor de post van minister-president. Wilt u door middel van een cijfer tussen 1 en 7 … |
| 2010W2Q065 | I shall now read you a number of statements. Would you tell me for each statement if, according to you, it is true or false? | Ik lees U nu enkele uitspraken voor. Wilt U voor elke uitspraak zeggen of dit volgens U zo is of niet zo is? |
| 2010W2Q066 | I consider myself to be well qualified to participate in politics. | Ik vind mezelf heel goed in staat om een actieve rol te spelen in de politiek. |
| 2010W2Q067 | I have a pretty good understanding of the important political issues facing our country. | Ik heb een goed beeld heb van de belangrijkste politieke problemen in ons land. |
| 2010W2Q068 | Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like me can't really understand what's going on. | Soms lijkt de politiek zo ingewikkeld dat mensen zoals ik niet echt kunnen begrijpen wat er speelt |
| 2010W2Q069 | I will again read to you a number of statements. Would you please indicate for this statements ifyou fully agree; agree; disagree; or fully… | Ik lees u weer een aantal uitspraken voor. Wilt u van deze uitspraken aangeven of u het daar helemaal mee eens, mee eens, mee oneens of hel… |
| 2010W2Q070 | Most of the time, our representatives in Parliament quickly loose touch with the people in the country. | Meestal verliezen onze vertegenwoordigers in de Tweede Kamer al snel het contact met de mensen in het land. |
| 2010W2Q071 | And to what extent do you agree with the following statements about politicians? | En in hoeverre bent u het eens met de volgende stellingen over politici: |
| 2010W2Q072 | Could you indicate by means of this card to what extent you agree or disagree with these statements. | En in hoeverre bent u het eens of oneens met de volgende stellingen? |
| 2010W2Q073 | Could you indicate for each of the following organizations or associations whether you are a member or not? | Kunt u aangeven voor de volgende organisaties of u een lid bent? |
| 2010W2Q074 | Suppose the Second Chamber were considering a bill that you felt was extremely unjust or wrong. How great is the chance that you would atte… | Stel: de Tweede Kamer behandelt een wetsvoorstel dat u zeer onrechtvaardig of verkeerd vindt. Hoe groot is de kans dat u zou proberen daar … |
| 2010W2Q075 | There are various ways to try to bring something to attention in politics or to exercise influence on politicians or the government. Would … | Er zijn verschillende manieren om iets politiek aan de orde te stellen of invloed uit te oefenen op politici of de overheid. Wilt u de volg… |
| 2010W2Q076 | Would you indicate to me for each of the following Dutch institutions whether you trust them very much, fairly much, not so much, or not at… | Wilt u mij voor elk van de volgende Nederlandse instellingen zeggen of u daar heel veel, tamelijk veel, niet zo veel of helemaal geen vertr… |
| 2010W2Q077 | In general, do you think that most people can be trusted or do you think one can not be careful enough in contacts with other people? | Vindt u over het algemeen dat de meeste mensen wel te vertrouwen zijn of vindt u dat men niet voorzichtig genoeg kan zijn in de omgang met … |
| 2010W2Q078 | De volgende vragen gaan over de economische situatie van Nederland. | The next questions are about the economic situation of the Netherlands. |
| 2010W2Q079 | Now I would like to ask you some questions about politics and religion. | Nu wil ik u enkele vragen stellen over politiek en godsdienst. |
| 2010W2Q080 | Do you completely agree, agree, disagree, or completely disagree with the following statement? `Religion is a good guide in politics ' | Bent U het met de volgende uitspraak helemaal eens, eens, oneens of helemaal oneens? Het geloof is voor de politiek een goede wegwijzer. |
| 2010W2Q081 | Do you think the membership of the Netherlands of the EU is in general: | Vindt u het lidmaatschap van Nederland van de EU in het algemeen gesproken: |
| 2010W2Q082 | Can Turkey become a member of the EU under terms; or can Turkey never become a member of the EU? | Volgens sommige mensen moet Turkije op termijn lid kunnen worden van de Europese Unie, als dat land voldoet aan voorwaarden van democratie … |
| 2010W2Q083 | Could you indicate on a scale from 1 to 7 how fast the advancement process in Europe is going, where as 1 stands for standing still and 7 f… | Kunt u op een schaal van 1 tot 7 aangeven hoe snel volgens u op dit moment het opbouwproces in Europa verloopt, waarbij de1 staat voor stil… |
| 2010W2Q084 | And what speed of the advancement process would you wish? | En welke snelheid van het opbouwproces zou u wensen? |
| 2010W2Q085 | How satisfied are you with the way Members of Parliament are elected in the Netherlands? Are you: very unsatisfied; not so satisfied; fairl… | Hoe tevreden bent u over de manier waarop Tweede Kamerleden in Nederland worden gekozen. Bent u daarover: helemaal niet tevreden; niet zo t… |
| 2010W2Q086 | Do you fully agree; agree; disagree; or fully disagree with the following statements: | Bent u het met de volgende uitspraken helemaal eens, eens, niet mee eens maar ook niet mee oneens, oneens of helemaal oneens |
| 2010SQ01 | Below there are a few television programs that are being broadcast every day, or nearly every day. On the average, how often per week do yo… | Hieronder staan televisieprogramma's die elke dag, of bijna elke dag worden uitgezonden. Hoe vaak in de week kijkt u gemiddeld naar deze … |
| 2010SQ02 | Many people use the Internet as a source of news. Below, there are some well-known news sources on the Internet. Can you indicate how often… | Veel mensen maken gebruik van het internet voor het nieuws. Hieronder staan enkele bekende nieuwsbronnen op het internet. Kunt u aangeven h… |
| 2010SQ03 | What do you think about the following statements about Europe: | Wat vindt u van de volgende stellingen over Europa |
| 2010SQ04 | And to what extent do you agree with the following statements about politics: | En in hoeverre bent u het eens met de volgende stellingen over de politiek: |
| 2010SQ05 | And to what extent do you agree with the following statements about the attachment to the Netherlands: | En in hoeverre bent u het eens met de volgende stellingen over de verbondenheid met Nederland: |
| 2010SQ06 | And to what extent do you agree with the following statements about double passports: | En in hoeverre bent u het eens met de volgende stellingen over dubbele paspoorten: |
| 2010SQ07 | And to what extent do you agree with these statement | En in hoeverre bent u het eens met deze stellingen |
| 2010SQ08 | And with the following statements: Everyone should be free to... | En met deze stellingen: Ik vind dat iedereen vrij moet zijn om... |
| 2010SQ09 | To what degree do you agree with the following statements | En in hoeverre bent u het eens met de volgendestellingen: |
| 2010SQ10 | Political parties emphasize different kinds of issues. We would like to know the first issue you think of with the three major parties and … | Politieke partijen leggen de nadruk op verschillende onderwerpen. Wilt u in onderstaand schema aangeven aan welke onderwerpen u het eerst… |
| 2010SQ11 | What do you think; should the Netherlands have nuclear weapons? | Wat vind u: moet Nederland wel of niet over kernwapens beschikken? |
| 2010SQ12 | During your stay in the voting locale, did you see multiple persons in one voting booth? | Heeft u tijdens uw verblijf in het stemlokaal gezien dat meerdere personen zich in een stemhokje bevonden? |
| Variable | Dataset | English | Dutch |
|---|---|---|---|
| study | DPES2010 | DANS Study Identification | |
| rnr | DPES2010 | Respondent identification number | |
| v001 | DPES2010 | Type of interview record I, first wave | |
| v002 | DPES2010 | Type of interview record I, second wave | |
| v003 | DPES2010 | Type of interview record I, drop off | |
| v004 | DPES2010 | Type of interview record II | |
| v005 | DPES2010 | Month of interview, first wave | |
| v006 | DPES2010 | Month of interview, second wave | |
| v007 | DPES2010 | Date of making this file by Statistics Netherlands (CBS) (yyyymmdd) | |
| wgt1 | DPES2010 | Weight I: age, gender, marital status, urbanization, region, ethnicity (CAPI wave1) | |
| wgt1b | DPES2010 | Weight I with a multiplication factor to represent population size | |
| wgt2 | DPES2010 | Weight II: age, gender, marital status, urbanization, region, ethnicity (All wave 1) | |
| wgt2b | DPES2010 | Weight II with a multiplication factor to represent population size | |
| wgt3 | DPES2010 | Weight III: age, gender, marital status, urbanization, region, ethnicity (CAPI wave I & II) | |
| wgt3b | DPES2010 | Weight III with a multiplication factor to represent population size | |
| wgt4 | DPES2010 | Weight IV: age, gender, marital status, urbanization, region, ethnicity, turnout (CAPI wave I & II) | |
| wgt4b | DPES2010 | Weight IV with a multiplication factor to represent population size | |
| wgt5 | DPES2010 | Weight V: age, gender, marital status, urbanization, region, ethnicity (All wave I & II) | |
| wgt5b | DPES2010 | Weight 5 with a multiplication factor to represent population size | |
| wgt6 | DPES2010 | Weight VI: : age, gender, marital status, urbanization, region, ethnicity, turnout (All wave I & II) | |
| wgt6b | DPES2010 | Weight VI with a multiplication factor to represent population size | |
| wgt7 | DPES2010 | Weight VII: age, gender, marital status, urbanization, region, ethnicity (All wave I, II & III) | |
| wgt7b | DPES2010 | Weight VII with a multiplication factor to represent population size | |
| wgt8 | DPES2010 | Weight VIII: age, gender, marital status, urbanization, region, ethnicity, turnout (All wave I, II & III) | |
| wgt8b | DPES2010 | Weight VIII with a multiplication factor to represent population size | |
| v010 | DPES2010 | Respondent - Gender | |
| v011 | DPES2010 | Respondent - Year of birth | |
| v012 | DPES2010 | Respondent - Age at date interview | |
| v017 | DPES2010 | Marital status respondent | |
| v018 | DPES2010 | Electoral cohort respondent | |
| v020 | DPES2010 | Frequency reading newspaper | |
| v021 | DPES2010 | Reads about national news? | |
| v022 | DPES2010 | Talks about national news? | |
| v023 | DPES2010 | Reads about foreign news? | |
| v024 | DPES2010 | Interested in politics | |
| v025 | DPES2010 | Political interest score | |
| v035 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching NOS TV newscast | |
| v036 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching RTL4 TV newscast | |
| v037 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting internet sites | |
| v040 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem (text) | |
| v041 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem (first answer) | |
| v042 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem (second answer) | |
| v043 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem (third answer) | |
| v044 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem (fourth answer) | |
| v045 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem (fifth answer) | |
| v046 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem (sixth answer) | |
| v026 | DPES2010 | Daily newspaper - de Telegraaf | |
| v027 | DPES2010 | Daily newspaper - de Volkskrant | |
| v028 | DPES2010 | Daily newspaper - Trouw | |
| v029 | DPES2010 | Daily newspaper - NRC Handelsblad | |
| v030 | DPES2010 | Daily newspaper - NRC Next | |
| v031 | DPES2010 | Daily newspaper - Algemeen Dagblad | |
| v032 | DPES2010 | Daily newspaper - Metro | |
| v033 | DPES2010 | Daily newspaper - Spits | |
| v034 | DPES2010 | Daily newspaper - Other | |
| v050 | DPES2010 | Resignation Balkenende Cabinet – reason (text) | |
| v051 | DPES2010 | Resignation Balkenende Cabinet – reason (first answer) | |
| v052 | DPES2010 | Resignation Balkenende Cabinet – reason (second answer) | |
| v053 | DPES2010 | Resignation Balkenende Cabinet: Rightly? | |
| v054 | DPES2010 | Guilty of resignation Balkenende Cabinet (text) | |
| v055 | DPES2010 | Guilty of resignation Balkenende Cabinet (first answer) | |
| v056 | DPES2010 | Guilty of resignation Balkenende Cabinet (second answer) | |
| v060 | DPES2010 | Respondent is (not) adherent to a party? | |
| v061 | DPES2010 | Respondent is (not) more attracted to a party? | |
| v062 | DPES2010 | Respondent is adherent to (which party?) | |
| v063 | DPES2010 | Respondent is (not) convinced adherent to a party | |
| v064 | DPES2010 | Direction of party identification | |
| v065 | DPES2010 | Strength of party identification | |
| v066 | DPES2010 | Respondent is (not) member of a party | |
| v067 | DPES2010 | Respondent is member of: | |
| v068 | DPES2010 | Is voting a civic duty or a matter of choice? | |
| v069 | DPES2010 | Extent to which voting is a civic duty | |
| v070 | DPES2010 | Effect government policy on economic situation | |
| v071 | DPES2010 | Effect government policy on employment situation | |
| v072 | DPES2010 | Effect government policy on respondent''s finances | |
| v073 | DPES2010 | General satisfaction with government | |
| v074 | DPES2010 | Government satisfaction score | |
| v080 | DPES2010 | Intends to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections | |
| v081 | DPES2010 | Vote intention 2010 parliamentary elections | |
| v082 | DPES2010 | Decided: Does consider other party | |
| v083 | DPES2010 | Does consider party: CDA | |
| v084 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: PvdA | |
| v085 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: VVD | |
| v086 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: GroenLinks | |
| v087 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: SP | |
| v088 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: D66 | |
| v089 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: ChristenUnie | |
| v090 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: SGP | |
| v091 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v092 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: PvdD | |
| v093 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: TON (Rita Verdonk) | |
| v094 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: Blanco | |
| v095 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: Invalid | |
| v096 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: Other | |
| v097 | DPES2010 | Does consider specific party: DK | |
| v098 | DPES2010 | Vote intention if non-voter is obliged to vote | |
| v100 | DPES2010 | Not decided: whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections | |
| v101 | DPES2010 | Not voting: Does consider specific party | |
| v102 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: CDA | |
| v103 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: PvdA | |
| v104 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: VVD | |
| v105 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: GroenLinks | |
| v106 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: SP | |
| v107 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: D66 | |
| v108 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: ChristenUnie | |
| v109 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: SGP | |
| v110 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: PVV | |
| v111 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: PvdD | |
| v112 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: TON (Rita Verdonk) | |
| v113 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: Blanco | |
| v114 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: Invalid | |
| v115 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: Other | |
| v116 | DPES2010 | Not decided whether to vote in 2010 parliamentary elections does consider party: DK | |
| v120 | DPES2010 | Frequency of encountering poll results | |
| v121 | DPES2010 | Perceived accuracy of poll results | |
| v122 | DPES2010 | CDA: Expected number of seats | |
| v123 | DPES2010 | VVD: Expected number of seats | |
| v124 | DPES2010 | PvdA: Expected number of seats | |
| v125 | DPES2010 | PVV (Geert Wilders): Expected number of seats | |
| v126 | DPES2010 | D66: Expected number of seats | |
| v130 | DPES2010 | Euthanasia - position of CDA | |
| v131 | DPES2010 | Euthanasia - position of PvdA | |
| v132 | DPES2010 | Euthanasia - position of VVD | |
| v133 | DPES2010 | Euthanasia - position of PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v134 | DPES2010 | Euthanasia - position of D66 | |
| v135 | DPES2010 | Euthanasia - position of SP | |
| v136 | DPES2010 | Euthanasia - position of respondent | |
| v140 | DPES2010 | Income differences - position of CDA | |
| v141 | DPES2010 | Income differences - position of PvdA | |
| v142 | DPES2010 | Income differences - position of VVD | |
| v143 | DPES2010 | Income differences - position of D66 | |
| v144 | DPES2010 | Income differences - position of PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v145 | DPES2010 | Income differences - position of SP | |
| v146 | DPES2010 | Income differences - position of respondent | |
| v150 | DPES2010 | Asylum seekers - position of CDA | |
| v151 | DPES2010 | Asylum seekers - position of PvdA | |
| v152 | DPES2010 | Asylum seekers - position of VVD | |
| v153 | DPES2010 | Asylum seekers - position of D66 | |
| v154 | DPES2010 | Asylum seekers - position of PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v155 | DPES2010 | Asylum seekers - position of all respondents | |
| v156 | DPES2010 | Asylum seekers - position of respondent | |
| v160 | DPES2010 | Crime - position of CDA | |
| v161 | DPES2010 | Crime - position of PvdA | |
| v162 | DPES2010 | Crime - position of VVD | |
| v163 | DPES2010 | Crime - position of D66 | |
| v164 | DPES2010 | Crime - position of PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v165 | DPES2010 | Crime - position of SP | |
| v166 | DPES2010 | Crime - position of respondent | |
| v170 | DPES2010 | Foreigners - position of CDA | |
| v171 | DPES2010 | Foreigners - position of PvdA | |
| v172 | DPES2010 | Foreigners - position of VVD | |
| v173 | DPES2010 | Foreigners - position of D66 | |
| v174 | DPES2010 | Foreigners - position of PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v175 | DPES2010 | Foreigners - position of SP | |
| v176 | DPES2010 | Foreigners - position of respondent | |
| v200 | DPES2010 | Issue: Adoption by homosexual couples | |
| v201 | DPES2010 | Issue: More money for foreign aid | |
| v202 | DPES2010 | Issue: Turkey may become EU member | |
| v203 | DPES2010 | Issue: Big companies threat to democracy | |
| v204 | DPES2010 | Issue: Taxes should be cut | |
| v205 | DPES2010 | Issue: Shops should be closed on Sundays | |
| v206 | DPES2010 | Issue: Illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay | |
| v207 | DPES2010 | Issue: Mortgage deduction should be abolished | |
| v208 | DPES2010 | Issue: Genetic manipulation should be forbidden | |
| v209 | DPES2010 | Issue: The immigration of Muslims should be stopped | |
| v210 | DPES2010 | Issue: Pensioners should pay for AOW | |
| v211 | DPES2010 | Issue: Gay marriage should be forbidden | |
| v212 | DPES2010 | Issue: It was rightful to send soldiers to Afghanistan | |
| v213 | DPES2010 | Issue: Retirement age should be at 67 | |
| v214 | DPES2010 | Issue: Government should support banks running a risk of bankruptcy | |
| v220 | DPES2010 | Voted in most recent municipal elections | |
| v221 | DPES2010 | Municipal elections 2010: Party voted for | |
| v240 | DPES2010 | Voted in 2006 parliamentary elections | |
| v241 | DPES2010 | Party voted for in 2006 parliamentary elections | |
| v242 | DPES2010 | Always voted this party in parliamentary elections? | |
| v243 | DPES2010 | Did (not) cast preferential vote in 2006 | |
| v244 | DPES2010 | Did (not) always vote in parliamentary elections | |
| v250 | DPES2010 | Photo 1 Gerdi Verbeet (PvdA) – name (text) | |
| v251 | DPES2010 | Photo 1 Gerdi Verbeet (PvdA) – political party (text) | |
| v252 | DPES2010 | Photo 1 Gerdi Verbeet (PvdA) – political function (text) | |
| v253 | DPES2010 | Photo 2 Alexander Pechtold (D66) – name (text) | |
| v254 | DPES2010 | Photo 2 Alexander Pechtold (D66) – political party (text) | |
| v255 | DPES2010 | Photo 2 Alexander Pechtold (D66) – political function (text) | |
| v256 | DPES2010 | Photo 3 Camiel Eurlings (CDA) – name (text) | |
| v257 | DPES2010 | Photo 3 Camiel Eurlings (CDA) – political party (text) | |
| v258 | DPES2010 | Photo 3 Camiel Eurlings (CDA) – political function (text) | |
| v259 | DPES2010 | Photo 4 Tineke Huizinga (CU) – name (text) | |
| v260 | DPES2010 | Photo 4 Tineke Huizinga (CU) – political party (text) | |
| v261 | DPES2010 | Photo 4 Tineke Huizinga (CU) – political function (text) | |
| v262 | DPES2010 | Photo 1 Gerdi Verbeet (PvdA) – name | |
| v263 | DPES2010 | Photo 1 Gerdi Verbeet (PvdA) – political party | |
| v264 | DPES2010 | Photo 1 Gerdi Verbeet (PvdA) – political function | |
| v265 | DPES2010 | Photo 2 Alexander Pechtold (D66) – name | |
| v266 | DPES2010 | Photo 2 Alexander Pechtold (D66) – political party | |
| v267 | DPES2010 | Photo 2 Alexander Pechtold (D66) – political function | |
| v268 | DPES2010 | Photo 3 Camiel Eurlings (CDA) – name | |
| v269 | DPES2010 | Photo 3 Camiel Eurlings (CDA) – political party | |
| v270 | DPES2010 | Photo 3 Camiel Eurlings (CDA) – political function | |
| v271 | DPES2010 | Photo 4 Tineke Huizinga (CU) – name | |
| v272 | DPES2010 | Photo 4 Tineke Huizinga (CU) – political party | |
| v273 | DPES2010 | Photo 4 Tineke Huizinga (CU) – political function | |
| v274 | DPES2010 | Political Knowledge score 0-12 | |
| v275 | DPES2010 | Political Knowledge score 0-4 | |
| v276 | DPES2010 | Does know which parties were part of former government coalition | |
| v277 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of CDA as a coalition partner | |
| v278 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of PvdA as a coalition partner | |
| v279 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of VVD as a coalition partner | |
| v280 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of GroenLinks as a coalition partner | |
| v281 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of SP as a coalition partner | |
| v282 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of D66 as a coalition partner | |
| v283 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of ChristenUnie as a coalition partner | |
| v284 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of SGP as a coalition partner | |
| v285 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of PVV (Geert Wilders) as a coalition partner | |
| v286 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of PvdD as a coalition partner | |
| v287 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of LPF as a coalition partner | |
| v288 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of Partij één NL (Marco Pastors) as a coalition partner | |
| v289 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of Partij voor Nederland (Hilbrand Nawijn) as a coalition partner | |
| v290 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of local party as a coalition partner | |
| v291 | DPES2010 | Knowledge of other party as a coalition partner | |
| v292 | DPES2010 | Political Knowledge score 0-3 | |
| v300 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - CDA | |
| v301 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - PvdA | |
| v302 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - VVD | |
| v303 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - GroenLinks | |
| v304 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - SP | |
| v305 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - D66 | |
| v306 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - ChristenUnie | |
| v307 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - SGP | |
| v308 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v309 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - Partij voor de Dieren | |
| v310 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - TON (Rita Verdonk) | |
| v311 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - Local party | |
| v312 | DPES2010 | Preferred in new government coalition - other | |
| v313 | DPES2010 | More parties preferred in government coalition | |
| v314 | DPES2010 | Preferred other party in new government coalition | |
| v330 | DPES2010 | Does it matter which parties are in coalition? | |
| v331 | DPES2010 | Likelihood of coalition: PvdA, SP, GroenLinks | |
| v332 | DPES2010 | Likelihood of coalition: PvdA, GroenLinks, D66, VVD | |
| v333 | DPES2010 | Likelihood of coalition: CDA, VVD, D66 | |
| v334 | DPES2010 | Likelihood of coalition: CDA, VVD, PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v335 | DPES2010 | Likelihood of coalition: PvdA, CDA, D66 | |
| v340 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: CDA | |
| v341 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: PvdA | |
| v342 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: VVD | |
| v343 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: D66 | |
| v344 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: GroenLinks | |
| v345 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: SP | |
| v346 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v347 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: ChristenUnie | |
| v348 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: SGP | |
| v349 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: PvdD | |
| v350 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: TON (Rita Verdonk) | |
| v351 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: Jan-Peter Balkenende | |
| v352 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: Job Cohen | |
| v353 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: Mark Rutte | |
| v354 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: Alexander Pechtold | |
| v355 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: Femke Halsema | |
| v356 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: Emile Roemer | |
| v357 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: Geert Wilders | |
| v358 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: André Rouvoet | |
| v359 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: Kees van der Staaij | |
| v360 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: Marianne Thieme | |
| v361 | DPES2010 | Sympathy score: Rita Verdonk | |
| v370 | DPES2010 | Representation: Voter representation versus party line | |
| v371 | DPES2010 | Representation: Retrospective versus prospective | |
| v372 | DPES2010 | Representation: Following voters versus following MPs | |
| v380 | DPES2010 | Crime – holding suspect of terrorist attack in prison | |
| v381 | DPES2010 | Crime – torture should never be allowed | |
| v382 | DPES2010 | Crime – introduction of death penalty for certain crimes | |
| v383 | DPES2010 | Crime – strictly upholding law no matter consequences | |
| v384 | DPES2010 | Crime – punishment of crimes | |
| v385 | DPES2010 | Social protest and government response – occupation schools | |
| v386 | DPES2010 | Social protest and government response – firing occupying teachers | |
| v387 | DPES2010 | Part of family when between 10 and 16 years of age? | |
| v388 | DPES2010 | Male caretaker when 10 to 16 | |
| v389 | DPES2010 | Female caretaker when 10 to 16 | |
| v390 | DPES2010 | Discussed politics at home when adolescent | |
| v391 | DPES2010 | Party preference father known | |
| v392 | DPES2010 | Party preference father (first answer) | |
| v393 | DPES2010 | Party preference father (second answer) | |
| v395 | DPES2010 | Party preference mother known | |
| v396 | DPES2010 | Party preference mother (first answer) | |
| v397 | DPES2010 | Party preference mother (second answer) | |
| v400 | DPES2010 | Respondent is religious | |
| v401 | DPES2010 | Religious denomination | |
| v402 | DPES2010 | Attendance of religious services | |
| v403 | DPES2010 | Social class – self image | |
| v404 | DPES2010 | Member: Trade union | |
| v410 | DPES2010 | Highest education (completed) of respondent | |
| v411 | DPES2010 | Highest education (attended) of respondent | |
| v412 | DPES2010 | Highest education (completed) of partner | |
| v413 | DPES2010 | Highest education (attended) of partner | |
| v414 | DPES2010 | Works > 11 Hours per week | |
| v415 | DPES2010 | Position in work community | |
| v418 | DPES2010 | Occupation of respondent: ISCO classification (two digits) | |
| v419 | DPES2010 | Occupation of respondent: SBI 1993 classification | |
| v420 | DPES2010 | Highest education (completed) of responden (ISCED-code) | |
| v421 | DPES2010 | Highest education (attended) of responden (ISCED-code) | |
| v423 | DPES2010 | Highest education (completed) of partner (ISCED-code) | |
| v424 | DPES2010 | Highest education (attended) of partner (ISCED-code) | |
| v429 | DPES2010 | Region | |
| v434 | DPES2010 | Degree of urbanization | |
| v435 | DPES2010 | Country of origin (three categories) | |
| v438 | DPES2010 | Type of household | |
| v440 | DPES2010 | number of persons in household | |
| v443 | DPES2010 | Age | |
| v445 | DPES2010 | Place of respondent in household | |
| v446 | DPES2010 | Social economic category respondent | |
| v448 | DPES2010 | number of persons in household | |
| v451 | DPES2010 | Spendable household income | |
| v452 | DPES2010 | Year of birth partner | |
| v500 | DPES2010 | Party differences during campaign | |
| v501 | DPES2010 | How closely did you follow the campaign? | |
| v503 | DPES2010 | Reading newspapers | |
| v504 | DPES2010 | Read campaign news in newspaper | |
| v505 | DPES2010 | Has seen electoral debates | |
| v510 | DPES2010 | Did vote in 2010 parliamentary elections | |
| v512 | DPES2010 | Party voted for in 2010 parliamentary elections | |
| v513 | DPES2010 | Reason party choice (text) | |
| v514 | DPES2010 | Reason party choice (first answer) | |
| v515 | DPES2010 | Reason party choice (second answer) | |
| v516 | DPES2010 | Reason party choice (third answer) | |
| v517 | DPES2010 | Party choice – when decided? | |
| v518 | DPES2010 | Party choice – when voted? | |
| v520 | DPES2010 | Did (not) cast preferential vote | |
| v521 | DPES2010 | Reason for preferential vote (main categories) | |
| v523 | DPES2010 | Reason for preferential vote (other) (text) | |
| v524 | DPES2010 | Reason for vote on first candidate | |
| v525 | DPES2010 | Vote if first candidate would have been lower on list | |
| v526 | DPES2010 | Vote if first candidate would not have been on list | |
| v527 | DPES2010 | Vote if candidate of choice would not have been on list | |
| v530 | DPES2010 | Respondent authorized someone to vote by proxy | |
| v531 | DPES2010 | Person authorized to vote by proxy | |
| v532 | DPES2010 | Has been authorized by someone to vote by proxy | |
| v533 | DPES2010 | Respondent received proxy from | |
| v535 | DPES2010 | Considered not to vote | |
| v536 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for other party? | |
| v573 | DPES2010 | Preferred party of non-voters | |
| v537 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: CDA | |
| v538 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: PvdA | |
| v539 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: VVD | |
| v540 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: GroenLinks | |
| v541 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: SP | |
| v542 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: D66 | |
| v543 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: ChristenUnie | |
| v544 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: SGP | |
| v545 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v546 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: PvdD | |
| v547 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: TON (Rita Verdonk) | |
| v549 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for: other party | |
| v550 | DPES2010 | Were parties competing you would never vote for? | |
| v552 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: CDA | |
| v553 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: PvdA | |
| v554 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: VVD | |
| v555 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: GroenLinks | |
| v556 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: SP | |
| v557 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: D66 | |
| v558 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: ChristenUnie | |
| v559 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: SGP | |
| v560 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v561 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: PvdD | |
| v562 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: TON (Rita Verdonk) | |
| v564 | DPES2010 | Would never vote for: other party | |
| v570 | DPES2010 | Why did respondent not vote (text) | |
| v571 | DPES2010 | Why did respondent not vote | |
| v572 | DPES2010 | Did not vote: When decided | |
| v580 | DPES2010 | Trust: Elections in general | |
| v581 | DPES2010 | Trust: Voting machine | |
| v582 | DPES2010 | Trust: In ballot paper | |
| v583 | DPES2010 | Prefer voting machine or ballot paper | |
| v584 | DPES2010 | Trust voting machine compared to ballot paper | |
| v585 | DPES2010 | Proxy voting should be possible | |
| v586 | DPES2010 | Does agree with ID check when voting | |
| v590 | DPES2010 | Frequency of encountering poll results | |
| v591 | DPES2010 | Poll results: Influence on party choice | |
| v592 | DPES2010 | Poll results: Influence on turning out to vote | |
| v600 | DPES2010 | Do you know vote matchers? | |
| v601 | DPES2010 | Did you fill in vote matcher? | |
| v602 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - CDA | |
| v603 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - PvdA | |
| v604 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - VVD | |
| v605 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - GroenLinks | |
| v606 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - SP | |
| v607 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - D66 | |
| v608 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - ChristenUnie | |
| v609 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - SGP | |
| v610 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v611 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - Partij voor de Dieren | |
| v612 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - TON (Rita Verdonk) | |
| v613 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - Local party | |
| v614 | DPES2010 | Advice of vote matcher - Other party | |
| v615 | DPES2010 | Influence vote matcher: Vote or abstain | |
| v616 | DPES2010 | Influence vote matcher: Party choice | |
| v617 | DPES2010 | Most important campaign issue (text) | |
| v618 | DPES2010 | Most important campaign issue (first) | |
| v619 | DPES2010 | Most important campaign issue (second) | |
| v621 | DPES2010 | Second most important campaign issue (text) | |
| v622 | DPES2010 | Second most important campaign issue (first) | |
| v623 | DPES2010 | Second most important campaign issue (second) | |
| v625 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem (text) | |
| v626 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem (first) | |
| v627 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem (second) | |
| v629 | DPES2010 | Second most important national problem (text) | |
| v630 | DPES2010 | Second most important national problem (first) | |
| v631 | DPES2010 | Second most important national problem (second) | |
| v633 | DPES2010 | Most important national problem: Party best able to solve problem | |
| v634 | DPES2010 | Second most important national problem: Party best able to solve problem | |
| v635 | DPES2010 | How much does it matter who is in charge? | |
| v636 | DPES2010 | How much does it matter which party one votes for? | |
| v637 | DPES2010 | Performance current government | |
| v638 | DPES2010 | Is there a party leader representing opinion best? | |
| v639 | DPES2010 | Considered to vote for other party? | |
| v640 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - Jan-Peter Balkenende | |
| v641 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - Job Cohen | |
| v642 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - Mark Rutte | |
| v643 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - Alexander Pechtold | |
| v644 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - Femke Halsema | |
| v645 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - Emile Roemer | |
| v646 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - Geert Wilders | |
| v647 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - André Rouvoet | |
| v648 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - Kees van der Staaij | |
| v649 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - Marianne Thieme | |
| v650 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - Rita Verdonk | |
| v651 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - other | |
| v652 | DPES2010 | Party leader representing opinion best - other (text) | |
| v653 | DPES2010 | Other party leader representing opinion best (text) | |
| v654 | DPES2010 | Other party leader representing opinion best | |
| v660 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for CDA | |
| v661 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for PvdA | |
| v662 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for VVD | |
| v663 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for D66 | |
| v664 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for GroenLinks | |
| v665 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for SP | |
| v666 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v667 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for ChristenUnie | |
| v668 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for SGP | |
| v669 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for PvdD | |
| v670 | DPES2010 | Probability of future vote for TON (Rita Verdonk) | |
| v680 | DPES2010 | Nuclear plants - position of CDA | |
| v681 | DPES2010 | Nuclear plants - position of PvdA | |
| v682 | DPES2010 | Nuclear plants - position of VVD | |
| v683 | DPES2010 | Nuclear plants - position of D66 | |
| v684 | DPES2010 | Nuclear plants - position of PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v685 | DPES2010 | Nuclear plants - position of SP | |
| v686 | DPES2010 | Nuclear plants - position of respondent | |
| v690 | DPES2010 | European unification - position of CDA | |
| v691 | DPES2010 | European unification - position of PvdA | |
| v692 | DPES2010 | European unification - position of VVD | |
| v693 | DPES2010 | European unification - position of D66 | |
| v694 | DPES2010 | European unification - position of PVV (Geert Wilders) | |
| v695 | DPES2010 | European unification - position of SP | |
| v696 | DPES2010 | European unification - position of respondent | |
| v697 | DPES2010 | International military missions – position of respondent | |
| v700 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of CDA (10 point scale) | |
| v701 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of PvdA (10 point scale) | |
| v702 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of VVD (10 point scale) | |
| v703 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of D66 (10 point scale) | |
| v704 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of GroenLinks (10 point scale) | |
| v705 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of SP (10 point scale) | |
| v706 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of PVV (Geert Wilders) (10 point scale) | |
| v707 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of ChristenUnie (10 point scale) | |
| v708 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of SGP (10 point scale) | |
| v709 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of PvdD (10 point scale) | |
| v710 | DPES2010 | Left-right rating of TON (Rita Verdonk) (10 point scale) | |
| v711 | DPES2010 | Left-right self-rating (10 point scale) | |
| v720 | DPES2010 | Satisfaction with democracy in the Netherlands | |
| v721 | DPES2010 | Satisfaction with democracy in the European Union | |
| v722 | DPES2010 | Opinions of MPs reflect opinions of electorate | |
| v730 | DPES2010 | Faith in Mark Rutte as Prime Minister | |
| v731 | DPES2010 | Faith in Job Cohen as Prime Minister | |
| v732 | DPES2010 | Faith in Jan-Peter Balkenende as Prime Minister | |
| v733 | DPES2010 | Faith in Geert Wilders as Prime Minister | |
| v734 | DPES2010 | Faith in Alexander Pechtold as Prime Minister | |
| v740 | DPES2010 | MPs do not care about opinions of people like me | |
| v741 | DPES2010 | Parties are only interested in my vote and not in my opinion | |
| v742 | DPES2010 | People like me have no influence on politics | |
| v743 | DPES2010 | External efficacy score | |
| v744 | DPES2010 | Consider myself qualified for politics | |
| v745 | DPES2010 | Good understanding of political problems | |
| v746 | DPES2010 | Politics too complicated for people like me | |
| v747 | DPES2010 | Internal efficacy score | |
| v748 | DPES2010 | Politicians promise more than they can deliver | |
| v749 | DPES2010 | Ministers and junior-ministers are primarily self-interested | |
| v750 | DPES2010 | Friends more important than abilities to become MP | |
| v751 | DPES2010 | MPs quickly lose contact with voters | |
| v752 | DPES2010 | Political cynicism score | |
| v753 | DPES2010 | Politicians are honest | |
| v754 | DPES2010 | Politicians are profiteers | |
| v755 | DPES2010 | Politicians keep their promises | |
| v756 | DPES2010 | Politicians are corrupt | |
| v757 | DPES2010 | Politicians are reliable | |
| v758 | DPES2010 | Politicians only have fine talk | |
| v759 | DPES2010 | Politicians do not understand what is going on in society | |
| v760 | DPES2010 | Politicians are capable of solving problems in society | |
| v761 | DPES2010 | Most politicians are competent people | |
| v762 | DPES2010 | Only few people I can really talk to | |
| v763 | DPES2010 | There is always someone who can help me | |
| v764 | DPES2010 | I often feel forsaken | |
| v765 | DPES2010 | There is nobody who is interested in me | |
| v770 | DPES2010 | Member: Environmental organization | |
| v771 | DPES2010 | Member: Third world, human rights or peace organization | |
| v772 | DPES2010 | Member: Professional organization | |
| v773 | DPES2010 | Member: Employers organisation | |
| v774 | DPES2010 | Member: Neighborhood organization | |
| v775 | DPES2010 | Member: Music or cultural organization | |
| v776 | DPES2010 | Member: Sports organization | |
| v777 | DPES2010 | Member: Church | |
| v778 | DPES2010 | Member: Other | |
| v779 | DPES2010 | Member: Which other (text) | |
| v780 | DPES2010 | Other members of household member of trade union? | |
| v781 | DPES2010 | Chance acting against unjust national bill | |
| v782 | DPES2010 | Did (not) try to get radio, TV or newspaper involved | |
| v783 | DPES2010 | Did (not) try to involve political party or organization | |
| v784 | DPES2010 | Did (not) participate in a meeting organized by government | |
| v785 | DPES2010 | Did (not) contact politician or civil servant | |
| v786 | DPES2010 | Did (not) join a civic action group | |
| v787 | DPES2010 | Did (not) join a demonstration | |
| v788 | DPES2010 | Did (not) use internet, email or SMS | |
| v789 | DPES2010 | Did (not) do other things to influence government | |
| v790 | DPES2010 | Did none of the above | |
| v800 | DPES2010 | Trust: Churches | |
| v801 | DPES2010 | Trust: Army | |
| v802 | DPES2010 | Trust: Judges | |
| v803 | DPES2010 | Trust: Press | |
| v804 | DPES2010 | Trust: Police | |
| v805 | DPES2010 | Trust: Government | |
| v806 | DPES2010 | Trust: National Parliament | |
| v807 | DPES2010 | Trust: Civil servants | |
| v808 | DPES2010 | Trust: Big companies | |
| v809 | DPES2010 | Trust: European Union | |
| v810 | DPES2010 | Trust: NATO | |
| v811 | DPES2010 | Trust: Political parties | |
| v812 | DPES2010 | Trust: Financial institutions | |
| v813 | DPES2010 | Trust: Most people can be trusted or you can''t be too careful | |
| v820 | DPES2010 | Evaluation economic situation in the Netherlands: past twelve months | |
| v821 | DPES2010 | Evaluation economic situation in the Netherlands: coming twelve months | |
| v822 | DPES2010 | Is it a good time to purchase durables? | |
| v823 | DPES2010 | Evaluation financial situation own household: past twelve months | |
| v824 | DPES2010 | Evaluation financial situation own household: coming twelve months | |
| v830 | DPES2010 | Should there be confessional parties? | |
| v831 | DPES2010 | Should there be confessional schools? | |
| v832 | DPES2010 | Religious schools: Separate Roman Catholic and Protestant Schools or Christian Unity | |
| v833 | DPES2010 | Religious schools: Allow Islamic schools | |
| v834 | DPES2010 | Religion good guide in politics | |
| v835 | DPES2010 | Evaluation of Dutch EU Membership | |
| v840 | DPES2010 | EU Membership Turkey | |
| v841 | DPES2010 | Perceived current speed of EU integration | |
| v842 | DPES2010 | Preferred speed EU integration | |
| v850 | DPES2010 | Satisfaction with the way MPs are elected | |
| v851 | DPES2010 | The inhabitants of the municipality should elect the mayor | |
| v852 | DPES2010 | The citizens should make important decisions for the country by referendum | |
| v853 | DPES2010 | The Prime Minister should be directly elected by the voters | |
| v854 | DPES2010 | Regional differences not enough accounted for in parliamentary elections | |
| v855 | DPES2010 | The Netherlands should be a republic | |
| v856 | DPES2010 | Democracy is the best form of government | |
| v860 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – As the World Turns (RTL4) | |
| v861 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – De Pfaffs (RTL7) | |
| v862 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – De Wereld Draait Door (Ned3) | |
| v863 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Editie NL (RTL4) | |
| v864 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Een Vandaag (Ned1) | |
| v865 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Goede Tijden, Slechte Tijden (RTL4) | |
| v866 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Half 8 nieuws (RTL4) | |
| v867 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Hart van Nederland (SBS6) | |
| v868 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Law and Order (Net5) | |
| v869 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Lingo (Ned1) | |
| v890 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Man Bijt Hond (Ned2) | |
| v891 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Netwerk (Ned2) | |
| v892 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – NOS 8 uur journaal (Ned1) | |
| v893 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – NOS 10 uur journaal (Ned3) | |
| v894 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – NOVA/Den Haag Vandaag (Ned2) | |
| v895 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Onderweg naar Morgen (Ned3) | |
| v896 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Pauw en Witteman (Ned1) | |
| v897 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – RTL Boulevard (RTL4) | |
| v898 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – RTL nieuws late editie (RTL4) | |
| v899 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Shownieuws (SBS6) | |
| v900 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Sportjournaal (Ned3) | |
| v901 | DPES2010 | Frequency watching – Wie is de chef? (RTL5) | |
| v910 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - Nos.nl | |
| v911 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - Geenstijl.nl | |
| v912 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - Nu.nl | |
| v913 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - Telegraaf.nl | |
| v914 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - Elsevier.nl | |
| v915 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - NRC.nl | |
| v916 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - Volkskrant.nl | |
| v917 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - Google news | |
| v918 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - Fok.nl | |
| v919 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - AD.nl | |
| v920 | DPES2010 | Other website visited (I) (text) | |
| v921 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - Other (I) | |
| v922 | DPES2010 | Other website visited (II) (text) | |
| v923 | DPES2010 | Frequency visiting - Other (II) | |
| v930 | DPES2010 | Future European treaties should be discussed in a popular referendum | |
| v931 | DPES2010 | Future European enlargements should be discussed in a popular referendum | |
| v940 | DPES2010 | Solely backroom politics is practitioned in the Hague | |
| v941 | DPES2010 | The government has the most honorable intentions | |
| v942 | DPES2010 | Political parties know what makes voters tick | |
| v943 | DPES2010 | Dutch politics is corrupt | |
| v944 | DPES2010 | Dutch democracy functions well | |
| v945 | DPES2010 | Dutch politics does stand up for everyone's interests | |
| v950 | DPES2010 | I feel attached to the Netherlands and the Dutch | |
| v951 | DPES2010 | I consider myself more as a European or cosmopolitan instead of a Dutchman | |
| v952 | DPES2010 | I am proud to be Dutch | |
| v953 | DPES2010 | I feel more attached to region I live in than to the Netherlands | |
| v954 | DPES2010 | Every Dutch citizen should know the Dutch anthem | |
| v955 | DPES2010 | Dutch customs and traditions should be preserved | |
| v956 | DPES2010 | It would be a pity if the Dutch language would disappear | |
| v957 | DPES2010 | You can only be a real Dutchman if you are born in the Netherlands | |
| v958 | DPES2010 | If possible, individuals receiving a Dutch passport should disclaim other nationalities held | |
| v959 | DPES2010 | A minister should not be allowed to hold multiple nationalities | |
| v960 | DPES2010 | Blue-collar classes still struggle for an equal position in society | |
| v961 | DPES2010 | Class differences should be reduced in the Netherlands | |
| v962 | DPES2010 | The government should not interfere in the economy | |
| v965 | DPES2010 | Everyone should be free to say what they want in public | |
| v966 | DPES2010 | Everyone should be free to write what they want in public | |
| v967 | DPES2010 | Everyone should be free to protest in public | |
| v968 | DPES2010 | Everyone should be free to criticize the Royal family in public | |
| v969 | DPES2010 | Everyone should be free to occupy buildings to enforce justified claims | |
| v970 | DPES2010 | The Dutch culture is threatened | |
| v971 | DPES2010 | I am afraid Dutch economic prospects will deteriorate | |
| v972 | DPES2010 | I am worried that my neighborhood will deteriorate | |
| v973 | DPES2010 | I am afraid of increasing vandalism and violence in the Netherlands | |
| v974 | DPES2010 | I am afraid my own financial prospects will deteriorate | |
| v980 | DPES2010 | Issue associated with PvdA - 1 (textall respondents | |
| v981 | DPES2010 | Agrees with issue PvdA - 1 | |
| v982 | DPES2010 | Issue associated with PvdA - 2 (text) | |
| v983 | DPES2010 | Agrees with issue PvdA - 2 | |
| v984 | DPES2010 | Issue associated with CDA - 1 (text) | |
| v985 | DPES2010 | Agrees with issue CDA - 1 | |
| v986 | DPES2010 | Issue associated with CDA – 2 (text) | |
| v987 | DPES2010 | Agrees with issue CDA - 2 | |
| v988 | DPES2010 | Issue associated with VVD - 1 (text) | |
| v989 | DPES2010 | Agrees with issue VVD - 1 | |
| v990 | DPES2010 | Issue associated with VVD – 2 (text) | |
| v992 | DPES2010 | Issue associated with PVV - 1 (text) | |
| v993 | DPES2010 | Agrees with issue PVV - 1 | |
| v994 | DPES2010 | Issue associated with PVV - 2 (text) | |
| v995 | DPES2010 | Agrees with issue PVV - 2 | |
| v996 | DPES2010 | The Netherlands should have nuclear weapons | |
| v997 | DPES2010 | Did (not) see more than one person in the voting booth |