LISS panel > Public participation
Publisher
CentERdata
Creator
Daan Jacobs (Tilburg University); Wesley Kaufmann (Tilburg University)
Created
Aug 31 2020
Description
The survey is about public participation and legitimacy.
URL to resource
Panel
lissdata
Begin date
Jun 03 2019
| Name | English | Dutch |
|---|---|---|
| {intro} | This questionnaire is about involving citizens in public decisions. You will see a text about this on the following screens. Please read th… | Deze vragenlijst gaat over het betrekken van burgers bij publieke besluiten. Hierover krijgt u op de volgende schermen eerst een tekst te z… |
| {begin_vignet} | Recently, the municipality decided to develop a wasteland in your area. The site had not been used for a few years and local residents had … | Pas geleden besloot de gemeente om een braakliggend terrein in uw buurt te ontwikkelen. Het terrein werd al een paar jaar niet meer gebruik… |
| {v1-v4} | To see which of these two ideas would have the greatest added value for the population, the Mayor and Executive Board commissioned municipa… | Om te kijken welke van deze twee ideeën de grootste meerwaarde zou hebben voor de bevolking, gaf het College van Burgemeester en Wethouders… |
| {einde_vignet} | The result was a proposal in which one half of the site would become a park and the other half a business site. The proposal was adopted by… | Het resultaat was een voorstel waarbij de ene helft van het terrein een park zou worden en de andere helft een bedrijventerrein. Het CB&W n… |
| qe002 | We first ask you two questions to see if you have understood the text correctly. Which residents had a chance to be selected for the panel … | We stellen u eerst twee vragen om te kijken of u de tekst goed begrepen hebt. Welke burgers hadden kans om geselecteerd te worden voor het … |
| qe003 | How many residents were on the panel that was created by the Mayor and Executive Board to determine how the site could best be developed? | Uit hoeveel burgers bestond het panel dat door het CB&W was samengesteld om te bepalen hoe het terrein het beste ontwikkeld kon worden? |
| qe004 – qe005 | You will now be presented with two statements regarding the decision-making process described in the text. For each statement, please indic… | U krijgt nu twee uitspraken te zien over het in de tekst beschreven besluitvormingsproces. Geeft u alstublieft voor iedere uitspraak aan in… |
| qe006 | We now ask you some questions about the same decision-making process. Please read these questions carefully. What do you think of how the d… | Nu stellen we u een aantal vragen over hetzelfde besluitvormingsproces. Leest u deze vragen alstublieft goed. Wat vindt u van de manier waa… |
| qe007 – qe008 | ||
| qe009 – qe012 | ||
| qe013 | Finally, we would like to ask you the following. Some residents of the municipality are not happy with the proposed solution and have launc… | Als laatste vragen we u het volgende. Een aantal inwoners van de gemeente is niet blij met het genomen besluit en is een handtekeningenacti… |
| qe014 – qe018 | Note: Please complete the questionnaire until you are returned to the starting screen. Only then will the system register the questionnaire… | NB: Maakt u alstublieft de vragenlijst af totdat u weer bij het beginscherm komt. Pas dan registreert het systeem de vragenlijst als volled… |
| Variable | Dataset | English | Dutch |
|---|---|---|---|
| nomem_encr | qe19a | Number of household member encrypted | |
| qe19a_m | qe19a | Year and month of the field work period | |
| qe19a001 | qe19a | Random assignment to group 1-4; determines which vignette the respondents received. | |
| qe19a002 | qe19a | Which residents had a chance to be selected for the panel that was created by the Mayor and Executive Board to determine how the site could best be developed? | |
| qe19a003 | qe19a | How many residents were on the panel that was created by the Mayor and Executive Board to determine how the site could best be developed? | |
| qe19a004 | qe19a | This decision-making process is fair | |
| qe19a005 | qe19a | The outcome of this decision-making process is fair | |
| qe19a006 | qe19a | What do you think of how the decision was made? | |
| qe19a007 | qe19a | How fair do you think you as a citizen were treated when the decision was made? | |
| qe19a008 | qe19a | How fairly do you think the decision was made? | |
| qe19a009 | qe19a | How satisfied are you with this decision-making process? | |
| qe19a010 | qe19a | How satisfied are you with the way residents were involved in this decision-making procedure? | |
| qe19a011 | qe19a | How satisfied are you with this decision-making process compared to your expectations about a decision-making process? | |
| qe19a012 | qe19a | How satisfied are you with this decision-making process compared to an ideal decision-making process? | |
| qe19a013 | qe19a | Some residents of the municipality are not happy with the proposed solution and have launched a petition against it. Would you consider signing this petition? | |
| qe19a014 | qe19a | Was it difficult to answer the questions? | |
| qe19a015 | qe19a | Were the questions sufficiently clear? | |
| qe19a016 | qe19a | Did the questionnaire get you thinking about things? | |
| qe19a017 | qe19a | Was it an interesting subject? | |
| qe19a018 | qe19a | Did you enjoy answering the questions? | |
| qe19a019 | qe19a | Starting date of the questionnaire | |
| qe19a020 | qe19a | Starting time of the questionnaire | |
| qe19a021 | qe19a | End date of the questionnaire | |
| qe19a022 | qe19a | End time of the questionnaire | |
| qe19a023 | qe19a | Duration questionnaire in seconds |