Find researchers

The aim of this research is to describe attitudes towards older workers and to study selection decisions with respect to older workers.The study consists of four parts:- part 1 consists of a few questions for the whole panel, this part was fielded in January 2013 (and repeated in February for non-respondents)- part 2 consists of a questionnaire for managers, this part was fielded in January 2013 (and repeated in February for non-respondents)Following comments by respondents in January, question if13a004 was reformulated and again presented to the entire panel in March 2013. - part 3 consists of a few questions for the whole panel, this part was fielded in April 2013- part 4 consists of a vignette study for managers, the associated questionnaire was fielded in April 2013

This is part 1 of the study ‘Changing images of older workers’. The aim of this research is to describe attitudes towards older workers and to study selection decisions with respect to older workers.

This is part 3 of the study ‘Changing images of older workers’. The
aim of this research is to describe attitudes towards older workers and
to study selection decisions with respect to older workers.

This questionnaire concerns the measurement of the degree of prudence and temperance of respondents by observing several choices between lotteries. The questionnaire consisted of 25 tasks, divided into four parts. Each task involved a virtual throw of the dice, and the result of a throw always resulted in a certain behavior. A throw alternately involved one, two or three dice. Respondents were required to choose between two 'games'. The possible results of the two games always differed. Depending on the condition to which respondents were assigned the amounts were low, normal, or high and depending on the condition respondents were promised and awarded prizes or such prizes were neither promised nor awarded.

This experiment is about the way people make
decisions and how trust in others influences their decisions.The participants had to make decisions that determined how much money they and someone else would earn. The questionnaire consisted of four parts that each participant completed. At the end of the questionnaire, one of those parts was chosen at random. The amount of money that the participant earned in that part was subsequently paid out as real money.Several groups and types of players were differentiated, for more information on the conditions and design see the following pdf - link

In February 2012, the LISS panel was presented the “Don’t know” experiment. This experiment focuses on the effects of different ways of offering the "Don’t know" option by answering the research question: How does the "Don’t know" option influence the results of specific questions and of a survey or opinion poll as a whole?